🔧 TL3 Tools

Live demo (works without JavaScript):

BMR Calculator

Sample: Mifflin–St Jeor. 30 y, 75 kg, 180 cm male → ≈ 1663 kcal/day.

enter values in the form → exact result

🔥 BMR & Calorie Calculator

Written by Sarah Mitchell · Reviewed by Alex Chen · July 22, 2026

Calculate your Basal Metabolic Rate and daily calorie needs based on activity level.

Your Details

Results

Enter your details and click Calculate.

What the BMR Calculator Measures

Basal metabolic rate is the energy your body spends just staying alive: pumping blood, drawing breath, keeping organs warm and working, long before you stand up or lift anything. This calculator estimates that baseline with the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, then applies an activity multiplier to estimate Total Daily Energy Expenditure — TDEE — the calories a typical day actually burns.

The result panel lists four numbers. The headline BMR sits at the top in calories per day. Beneath it, TDEE for maintenance, a mild weight-loss row set 300 calories below TDEE, a standard loss row 500 below, and a gain row 300 above. The five activity levels in the dropdown feed the multiplier; the page preselects Moderate (3-5 days a week), factor 1.55.

How the Mifflin-St Jeor Equation Works

Mifflin-St Jeor is a straight line of arithmetic: ten times body weight in kilograms, plus 6.25 times height in centimeters, minus five times age in years, then a sex constant — add 5 for men, subtract 161 for women. The equation itself only understands metric, so the imperial tab converts first: pounds become kilograms at 0.453592 each, inches become centimeters at 2.54 each. Both tabs therefore agree on the result to within a calorie or two.

Every keystroke and every dropdown change triggers a fresh calculation — the Calculate button runs the same routine for convenience. The four displayed numbers round to whole calories, while the arithmetic underneath keeps fractional precision. Nothing you type leaves this page; the whole calculation runs in your browser.

A Worked Example: Two Builds, One Equation

A 30-year-old woman at 68 kilograms and 165 centimeters, light activity three days a week: 10 × 68 = 680, plus 6.25 × 165 = 1031.25, minus 5 × 30 = 150, minus the female constant 161. That sums to 1400.25, displayed as 1400 calories. The light multiplier of 1.375 lifts the TDEE to 1925. The panel then reads 1625 for mild loss, 1425 for the 500-calorie deficit, and 2225 for gain.

The same age with a heavier frame — 80 kilograms, 180 centimeters, male — works out to 800 + 1125 − 175 + 5 = 1755. Under a sedentary 1.2 multiplier that becomes a 2106-calorie TDEE.

Switching to the imperial tab with the equivalent 150 pounds and 65 inches yields 1401 for the same woman — the conversion constants are exact, so the two runs stay within a calorie or two of each other.

Where the Estimate Can Mislead You

  • Blank fields count as zero, quietly. The equation runs even with an empty box, so a cleared female form computes −161 calories: every weighted term collapses and only the constant remains. Fill all four inputs; there is no empty-state guard.
  • Age zero is accepted. An empty or zero age parses fine and the equation happily evaluates it, though no real adult matches it.
  • The activity factor is a guess you make. Five preset multipliers — 1.2, 1.375, 1.55, 1.725, 1.9 — summarize wildly different lives; two identical bodies with different selections get different TDEEs. A broken dropdown value falls back to 1.2.
  • Body composition is invisible to it. Two people of the same size, one carrying muscle and one carrying fat, get the same BMR even though their true resting rates differ; measured rates can sit ten percent or more away from the estimate.
  • The deficit rows are arithmetic, not advice. 300 and 500 are common starting targets, not a prescription for anyone in particular.

Questions About BMR, TDEE, and the Numbers

Why does the page show a negative number?

An empty field is read as zero. A cleared female form runs 0 + 0 − 0 − 161, which displays as −161; a male form shows 5. Enter real values in every box and the figure turns sensible.

Do the imperial and metric tabs agree?

Yes, to within rounding. The conversion constants 0.453592 and 2.54 are exact, so 150 pounds and 68 kilograms describe the same body, and the equation lands within a calorie or two.

Which activity level should I choose?

Match your weekly pattern to the labels: 1.2 for little or no exercise, 1.375 for light, 1.55 for moderate, 1.725 for active, 1.9 for intense daily work. When you sit between two labels, run both and treat the span as your range.

Is the BMR the same as calories burned exercising?

No. BMR is the resting baseline only; exercise is folded into the activity multiplier. The TDEE row, not the BMR row, is the day-level number.

Why 300 and 500 calories in the loss rows?

They are built-in, commonly used targets: a gentle 300-calorie deficit, a standard 500-calorie one, and a 300-calorie surplus for gaining. The calculator reports them; it does not decide which is right for you.

Can this replace a lab measurement?

No. A resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry is far more precise. Use the estimate for planning and tracking, and treat any figure here as a starting point rather than a diagnosis.

When to Use a BMR Estimate (and When Not To)

Reach for it when you need a planning number: a rough daily target before changing how you eat, a sanity check on a nutrition app's calorie figure, or a stable baseline to compare across months. Because the inputs are consistent, the trend between two dates means more than either single day.

Leave it on the shelf for medical decisions, for anything resembling a prescription, or when the true resting metabolism matters. And when the honest answer to "how much should I eat" needs a doctor, an equation is the wrong tool.